Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MACPX
CLBAX vs MACPX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MACPX
CLBAX vs MACPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MACPX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MACPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MACPX (1.8B). MACPX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: MACPX (2.40) vs CLBAX (1.80). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MACPX: CLBAX (25 years) vs MACPX (53 years). CLBAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than MACPX (0.55). MACPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 132.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACPX: CLBAX (250) vs MACPX (2000000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. MACPX (2.13). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. MACPX (8.01).
| CLBAX | MACPX | CLBAX / MACPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.54 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.55 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 53 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 2.171 | 391% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.8B | 15,833% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.40 | 75% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 2.13 | 314% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 29.76 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 8.01 | 415% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 42.77 | 223% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers