Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MACPX
CLBAX vs MACPX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MACPX
CLBAX vs MACPX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MACPX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MACPX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MACPX (1.79B). MACPX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: MACPX (2.44) vs CLBAX (1.82). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MACPX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MACPX (53 years). CLBAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than MACPX (0.55). MACPX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 101.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MACPX: CLBAX (250) vs MACPX (2000000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. MACPX (5.53). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. MACPX (7.35).
| CLBAX | MACPX | CLBAX / MACPX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.54 | 107% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.55 | 105% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 53 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.404 | 0.884 | 950% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.79B | 16,134% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 2.44 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 5.53 | 205% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.62 | 25.50 | 151% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | 7.35 | 464% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.45 | 41.15 | 227% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement