Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MBACX
CLBAX vs MBACX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MBACX
CLBAX vs MBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MBACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MBACX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MBACX (443M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than MBACX: CLBAX (1.80) vs MBACX (0.89). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MBACX: CLBAX (25 years) vs MBACX (24 years). MBACX (2.18) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). MBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBACX: CLBAX (250) vs MBACX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. MBACX (4.29). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. MBACX (-4.64).
| CLBAX | MBACX | CLBAX / MBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.08 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.18 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 6.907 | 123% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 443M | 64,334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.89 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 4.29 | 155% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 20.30 | 204% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | -4.64 | -716% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 12.21 | 779% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers