Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MBACX
CLBAX vs MBACX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MBACX
CLBAX vs MBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MBACX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and MBACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. MBACX (455M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than MBACX: CLBAX (1.82) vs MBACX (0.90). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MBACX: CLBAX (25 years) vs MBACX (24 years). MBACX (2.18) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). MBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBACX: CLBAX (250) vs MBACX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. MBACX (8.77). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.82 vs. MBACX (-3.21).
| CLBAX | MBACX | CLBAX / MBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.08 | 28% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.18 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.098 | 9.016 | 112% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 455M | 62,198% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 0.90 | 201% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.63 | 8.77 | 144% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.00 | 23.64 | 190% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.82 | -3.21 | -1,115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.05 | 12.19 | 772% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement