Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MBINX
CLBAX vs MBINX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MBINX
CLBAX vs MBINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MBINX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and MBINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MBINX (445M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than MBINX: CLBAX (1.78) vs MBINX (1.63). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MBINX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MBINX (18 years). MBINX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). MBINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MBINX (3%) vs MBINX (3%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBINX: CLBAX (250) vs MBINX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. MBINX (8.59). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.18 vs. MBINX (-2.97).
| CLBAX | MBINX | CLBAX / MBINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.33 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.43 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.696 | 4.720 | 205% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 140% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 445M | 62,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.63 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.74 | 8.59 | 207% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 22.58 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.18 | -2.97 | -1,251% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.87 | 17.49 | 559% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement