Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MBINX
CLBAX vs MBINX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MBINX
CLBAX vs MBINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MBINX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MBINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MBINX (443M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than MBINX: CLBAX (1.80) vs MBINX (1.61). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MBINX: CLBAX (25 years) vs MBINX (19 years). MBINX (1.43) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). MBINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MBINX (3%) vs MBINX (3%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBINX: CLBAX (250) vs MBINX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. MBINX (5.13). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. MBINX (-0.62).
| CLBAX | MBINX | CLBAX / MBINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.33 | 44% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.43 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 7.469 | 114% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 140% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 443M | 64,334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.61 | 112% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 5.13 | 130% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 23.17 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | -0.62 | -5,343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 19.79 | 481% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement