Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MBNAX
CLBAX vs MBNAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MBNAX
CLBAX vs MBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MBNAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MBNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MBNAX (443M). MBNAX (1.87) and CLBAX (1.80) have matching dividends . CLBAX was incepted earlier than MBNAX: CLBAX (25 years) vs MBNAX (23 years). MBNAX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). MBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MBNAX (3%) vs MBNAX (3%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBNAX: CLBAX (250) vs MBNAX (15000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. MBNAX (5.43). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. MBNAX (0.68).
| CLBAX | MBNAX | CLBAX / MBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.05 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.07 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 7.698 | 110% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 117% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 443M | 64,334% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.87 | 96% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 5.43 | 123% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 24.14 | 172% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 0.68 | 4,889% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 22.14 | 430% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers