Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MBNAX
CLBAX vs MBNAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MBNAX
CLBAX vs MBNAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MBNAX commentary
Jun 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and MBNAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MBNAX (445M). MBNAX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: MBNAX (1.88) vs CLBAX (1.78). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MBNAX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MBNAX (22 years). MBNAX (1.07) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). MBNAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 201.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX initial investment is less costly to investors than MBNAX (3%) vs MBNAX (3%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MBNAX: CLBAX (250) vs MBNAX (15000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. MBNAX (8.88). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.18 vs. MBNAX (-1.72).
| CLBAX | MBNAX | CLBAX / MBNAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.05 | 55% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.07 | 54% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 22 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.696 | 4.860 | 200% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 117% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 15000 | 2% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 445M | 62,697% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.88 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.74 | 8.88 | 200% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 23.53 | 193% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.18 | -1.72 | -2,162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.87 | 19.70 | 497% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement