Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MNBAX
CLBAX vs MNBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MNBAX
American Funds American Balanced 529A
Price$38.93
Change+$0.05 (+0.13%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets265.62B
Manning & Napier Pro-Blend Extnd Term S
Price$20.57
Change+$0.04 (+0.19%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets507.96M
CLBAX vs MNBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MNBAX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MNBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 266B vs. MNBAX (508M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: MNBAX (1.85) vs CLBAX (1.76). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MNBAX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MNBAX (32 years). MNBAX (1.02) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 71.00 vs. CLBAX (44.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: CLBAX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.72 vs. MNBAX (2.61). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 43.96 vs. MNBAX (9.57).
| CLBAX | MNBAX | CLBAX / MNBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.02 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.02 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.656 | 7.191 | 204% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 266B | 508M | 52,362% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.85 | 95% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.72 | 2.61 | 334% |
| Returns for 3 years | 51.33 | 28.71 | 179% |
| Returns for 5 years | 43.96 | 9.57 | 459% |
| Returns for 10 years | 88.01 | 37.44 | 235% |