Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MNBAX
CLBAX vs MNBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MNBAX
CLBAX vs MNBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MNBAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MNBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MNBAX (361M). MNBAX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: MNBAX (2.40) vs CLBAX (1.82). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MNBAX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MNBAX (33 years). MNBAX (1.03) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). MNBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 78.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MNBAX: CLBAX (250) vs MNBAX (2000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.32 vs. MNBAX (0.31). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.10 vs. MNBAX (-1.51).
| CLBAX | MNBAX | CLBAX / MNBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.03 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.03 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.404 | 3.662 | 229% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 361M | 79,778% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 2.40 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.32 | 0.31 | 3,680% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.62 | 14.81 | 261% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.10 | -1.51 | -2,255% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.45 | 31.25 | 299% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement