Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MSFFX
CLBAX vs MSFFX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MSFFX
CLBAX vs MSFFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MSFFX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and MSFFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. MSFFX (7.57B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than MSFFX: CLBAX (1.82) vs MSFFX (1.67). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MSFFX: CLBAX (25 years) vs MSFFX (21 years). MSFFX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFFX (41.00). MSFFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: MSFFX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. MSFFX (5.03). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.82 vs. MSFFX (-1.81).
| CLBAX | MSFFX | CLBAX / MSFFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.098 | 8.141 | 124% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 7.57B | 3,740% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.67 | 109% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.63 | 5.03 | 251% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.00 | 16.06 | 280% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.82 | -1.81 | -1,980% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.05 | 28.21 | 333% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers