Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MSFHX
CLBAX vs MSFHX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MSFHX
CLBAX vs MSFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MSFHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and MSFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MSFHX (7.36B). MSFHX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: MSFHX (2.32) vs CLBAX (1.80). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MSFHX: CLBAX (25 years) vs MSFHX (21 years). MSFHX (0.72) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFHX (41.00). MSFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: MSFHX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 7.75 vs. MSFHX (2.86). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.92 vs. MSFHX (0.02).
| CLBAX | MSFHX | CLBAX / MSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.72 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.72 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.049 | 6.210 | 146% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 7.36B | 3,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.32 | 78% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.75 | 2.86 | 271% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.93 | 14.62 | 287% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.92 | 0.02 | 174,587% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.21 | 36.23 | 260% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers