Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MSFHX
CLBAX vs MSFHX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MSFHX
CLBAX vs MSFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MSFHX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MSFHX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MSFHX (7.46B). MSFHX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: MSFHX (2.42) vs CLBAX (1.79). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MSFHX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MSFHX (21 years). MSFHX (0.72) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFHX (41.00). MSFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: MSFHX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.55 vs. MSFHX (3.04). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.85 vs. MSFHX (-0.25).
| CLBAX | MSFHX | CLBAX / MSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.72 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.72 | 81% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.425 | 4.855 | 194% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 7.46B | 3,861% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 2.42 | 74% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.55 | 3.04 | 413% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.64 | 13.14 | 325% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.85 | -0.25 | -14,480% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.33 | 34.86 | 271% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers