Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MSFJX
CLBAX vs MSFJX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MSFJX
CLBAX vs MSFJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MSFJX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MSFJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MSFJX (7.34B). MSFJX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: MSFJX (2.55) vs CLBAX (1.80). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MSFJX: CLBAX (25 years) vs MSFJX (21 years). CLBAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than MSFJX (0.47). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFJX (41.00). MSFJX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: MSFJX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. MSFJX (1.80). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. MSFJX (0.98).
| CLBAX | MSFJX | CLBAX / MSFJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.47 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.47 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 6.066 | 140% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 7.34B | 3,884% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.55 | 71% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 1.80 | 370% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 15.25 | 272% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 0.98 | 3,396% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 40.80 | 233% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers