Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MSFJX
CLBAX vs MSFJX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MSFJX
CLBAX vs MSFJX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MSFJX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and MSFJX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MSFJX (7.36B). MSFJX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: MSFJX (2.66) vs CLBAX (1.78). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MSFJX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MSFJX (21 years). CLBAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than MSFJX (0.47). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFJX (41.00). MSFJX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: MSFJX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.71 vs. MSFJX (4.17). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.84 vs. MSFJX (0.26).
| CLBAX | MSFJX | CLBAX / MSFJX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.47 | 123% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.47 | 123% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.372 | 2.550 | 368% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 7.36B | 3,911% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 2.66 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.71 | 4.17 | 400% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.28 | 12.99 | 341% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.84 | 0.26 | 14,478% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.00 | 40.17 | 251% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement