Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MSFKX
CLBAX vs MSFKX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MSFKX
CLBAX vs MSFKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MSFKX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MSFKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MSFKX (7.46B). MSFKX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: MSFKX (2.73) vs CLBAX (1.79). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MSFKX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MSFKX (14 years). CLBAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than MSFKX (0.40). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFKX (41.00). MSFKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: MSFKX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. MSFKX (3.90). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. MSFKX (1.44).
| CLBAX | MSFKX | CLBAX / MSFKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.40 | 145% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.40 | 145% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 5.031 | 170% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 7.46B | 3,861% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 2.73 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 3.90 | 309% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 13.20 | 301% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 1.44 | 2,420% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | 39.05 | 237% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement