Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MTRBX
CLBAX vs MTRBX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MTRBX
CLBAX vs MTRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MTRBX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and MTRBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. MTRBX (7.45B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than MTRBX: CLBAX (1.78) vs MTRBX (1.66). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MTRBX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MTRBX (33 years). MTRBX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MTRBX (41.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTRBX: CLBAX (250) vs MTRBX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. MTRBX (4.41). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.18 vs. MTRBX (-5.46).
| CLBAX | MTRBX | CLBAX / MTRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.696 | 2.671 | 363% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 7.45B | 3,744% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.66 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.74 | 4.41 | 402% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | 11.16 | 408% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.18 | -5.46 | -681% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.87 | 25.41 | 385% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement