Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MTRBX
CLBAX vs MTRBX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MTRBX
CLBAX vs MTRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MTRBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and MTRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MTRBX (7.36B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than MTRBX: CLBAX (1.78) vs MTRBX (1.66). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MTRBX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MTRBX (33 years). MTRBX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MTRBX (41.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTRBX: CLBAX (250) vs MTRBX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.71 vs. MTRBX (3.18). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.84 vs. MTRBX (-4.53).
| CLBAX | MTRBX | CLBAX / MTRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.372 | 2.150 | 436% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 7.36B | 3,911% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.66 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.71 | 3.18 | 525% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.28 | 9.71 | 456% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.84 | -4.53 | -836% |
| Returns for 10 years | 101.00 | 26.97 | 374% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement