Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs MTRBX
CLBAX vs MTRBX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs MTRBX
CLBAX vs MTRBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. MTRBX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and MTRBX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MTRBX (7.36B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than MTRBX: CLBAX (1.78) vs MTRBX (1.66). CLBAX was incepted earlier than MTRBX: CLBAX (24 years) vs MTRBX (33 years). MTRBX (1.47) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MTRBX (41.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than MTRBX: CLBAX (250) vs MTRBX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.88 vs. MTRBX (2.39). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.87 vs. MTRBX (-5.10).
| CLBAX | MTRBX | CLBAX / MTRBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.47 | 39% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.269 | 1.994 | 415% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 7.36B | 3,911% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.66 | 108% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.88 | 2.39 | 623% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.83 | 9.55 | 449% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.87 | -5.10 | -703% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.97 | 26.78 | 370% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement