Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs OAKBX
CLBAX vs OAKBX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs OAKBX
CLBAX vs OAKBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. OAKBX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and OAKBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. OAKBX (5.84B). OAKBX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: OAKBX (2.21) vs CLBAX (1.79). CLBAX was incepted earlier than OAKBX: CLBAX (24 years) vs OAKBX (31 years). OAKBX (0.85) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). OAKBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 69.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). OAKBX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: OAKBX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. OAKBX (8.90). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. OAKBX (21.91).
| CLBAX | OAKBX | CLBAX / OAKBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.85 | 68% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.85 | 68% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 2.951 | 290% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.84B | 4,931% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 2.21 | 81% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 8.90 | 136% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 31.78 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 21.91 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | 52.67 | 176% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement