Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs PGEMX
CLBAX vs PGEMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs PGEMX
CLBAX vs PGEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. PGEMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and PGEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PGEMX (2.41B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than PGEMX: CLBAX (1.79) vs PGEMX (0.88). CLBAX was incepted earlier than PGEMX: CLBAX (24 years) vs PGEMX (32 years). PGEMX (1.41) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). PGEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX (4%) and PGEMX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PGEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: PGEMX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. PGEMX (8.96). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. PGEMX (22.26).
| CLBAX | PGEMX | CLBAX / PGEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.41 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.41 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 7.690 | 111% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 2.41B | 11,940% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.88 | 203% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | 8.96 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 37.02 | 107% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | 22.26 | 156% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | 80.82 | 114% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers