Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs PGEMX
CLBAX vs PGEMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs PGEMX
CLBAX vs PGEMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. PGEMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and PGEMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. PGEMX (2.4B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than PGEMX: CLBAX (1.80) vs PGEMX (0.97). CLBAX was incepted earlier than PGEMX: CLBAX (25 years) vs PGEMX (32 years). PGEMX (1.41) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). PGEMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX (4%) and PGEMX (4%) have equivalent initial investment costs. PGEMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: PGEMX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. PGEMX (3.89). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. PGEMX (20.22).
| CLBAX | PGEMX | CLBAX / PGEMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.41 | 41% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.41 | 41% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 7.508 | 113% |
| Front Load | 4% | 4% | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 2.4B | 11,870% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.97 | 186% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 3.89 | 171% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 37.92 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 20.22 | 164% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 81.36 | 117% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers