Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs PGPCX
CLBAX vs PGPCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs PGPCX
CLBAX vs PGPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. PGPCX commentary
Jul 26, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and PGPCX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PGPCX (2.38B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than PGPCX: CLBAX (1.79) vs PGPCX (0.67). CLBAX was incepted earlier than PGPCX: CLBAX (24 years) vs PGPCX (27 years). PGPCX (1.66) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). PGPCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 97.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). PGPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: PGPCX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. PGPCX (6.20). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.49 vs. PGPCX (18.30).
| CLBAX | PGPCX | CLBAX / PGPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.66 | 35% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.66 | 35% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.785 | 6.090 | 128% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 2.38B | 12,111% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.67 | 269% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | 6.20 | 167% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.70 | 33.22 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.49 | 18.30 | 183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.19 | 73.61 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement