Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs PRPDX
CLBAX vs PRPDX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs PRPDX
CLBAX vs PRPDX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. PRPDX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and PRPDX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. PRPDX (7.13B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than PRPDX: CLBAX (1.80) vs PRPDX (0.91). CLBAX was incepted earlier than PRPDX: CLBAX (25 years) vs PRPDX (10 years). PRPDX (1.04) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. PRPDX (16.21). PRPDX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLBAX (4%) vs CLBAX (4%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PRPDX: CLBAX (250) vs PRPDX (1000). PRPDX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.40 vs. CLBAX (6.67). PRPDX return over 5 years is better than : 60.22 vs. CLBAX (33.22).
| CLBAX | PRPDX | CLBAX / PRPDX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.04 | 56% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.04 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 4.539 | 187% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 70% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 7.13B | 3,998% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.91 | 198% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 10.40 | 64% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 62.17 | 67% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 60.22 | 55% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 112.78 | 84% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement