Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs PSQGX
CLBAX vs PSQGX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs PSQGX
CLBAX vs PSQGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. PSQGX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and PSQGX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PSQGX (161M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than PSQGX: CLBAX (1.78) vs PSQGX (1.52). CLBAX was incepted earlier than PSQGX: CLBAX (24 years) vs PSQGX (12 years). PSQGX (1.10) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. PSQGX (9.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than PSQGX: CLBAX (250) vs PSQGX (2000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. PSQGX (-3.55). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.04 vs. PSQGX (7.24).
| CLBAX | PSQGX | CLBAX / PSQGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.97 | 60% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.10 | 53% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 12 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.651 | 2.112 | 410% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 161M | 178,882% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.52 | 118% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.90 | -3.55 | -420% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.62 | 9.15 | 466% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.04 | 7.24 | 484% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.94 | 64.81 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement