Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs QABGX
CLBAX vs QABGX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs QABGX
CLBAX vs QABGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. QABGX commentary
Aug 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and QABGX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. QABGX (335M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than QABGX: CLBAX (1.82) vs QABGX (1.12). CLBAX was incepted earlier than QABGX: CLBAX (25 years) vs QABGX (21 years). QABGX (1.35) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). QABGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). QABGX initial investment is less costly to investors than CLBAX (4%) vs CLBAX (4%). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QABGX: CLBAX (250) vs QABGX (1500). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. QABGX (5.45). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.82 vs. QABGX (8.71).
| CLBAX | QABGX | CLBAX / QABGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.34 | 43% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.35 | 43% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.098 | 8.104 | 125% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 78% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 335M | 84,478% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.12 | 161% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.63 | 5.45 | 232% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.00 | 33.77 | 133% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.82 | 8.71 | 411% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.05 | 57.32 | 164% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers