Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs QCBGX
CLBAX vs QCBGX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs QCBGX
CLBAX vs QCBGX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. QCBGX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and QCBGX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. QCBGX (332M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than QCBGX: CLBAX (1.80) vs QCBGX (0.57). CLBAX was incepted earlier than QCBGX: CLBAX (25 years) vs QCBGX (21 years). QCBGX (2.11) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). QCBGX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 82.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than QCBGX: CLBAX (250) vs QCBGX (1500). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. QCBGX (-0.00). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. QCBGX (1.58).
| CLBAX | QCBGX | CLBAX / QCBGX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.11 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.11 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 6.070 | 140% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1500 | 17% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 332M | 85,843% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.57 | 317% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | -0.00 | -402,089% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 26.08 | 159% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 1.58 | 2,104% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 47.32 | 201% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers