Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs RLBFX
CLBAX vs RLBFX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs RLBFX
CLBAX vs RLBFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. RLBFX commentary
Jul 02, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and RLBFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX (288B) and RLBFX (288B) have equal amount of cash in the bank . RLBFX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: RLBFX (2.03) vs CLBAX (1.79). CLBAX was incepted earlier than RLBFX: CLBAX (24 years) vs RLBFX (24 years). CLBAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than RLBFX (0.30). CLBAX (50.00) and RLBFX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. CLBAX (250) and RLBFX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. RLBFX (13.85) and CLBAX (13.52) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBAX (35.93) and RLBFX (35.85) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBAX | RLBFX | CLBAX / RLBFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.30 | 193% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.30 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.318 | 9.483 | 98% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 288B | 100% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 2.03 | 88% |
| Returns for 1 year | 13.52 | 13.85 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.27 | 43.59 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.93 | 35.85 | 100% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.58 | 89.33 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement