Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs RPBAX
CLBAX vs RPBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs RPBAX
CLBAX vs RPBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. RPBAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and RPBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. RPBAX (5.26B). RPBAX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: RPBAX (1.99) vs CLBAX (1.80). CLBAX was incepted earlier than RPBAX: CLBAX (25 years) vs RPBAX (87 years). RPBAX (0.66) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RPBAX (43.70). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPBAX: CLBAX (250) vs RPBAX (2500). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. RPBAX (4.95). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. RPBAX (9.93).
| CLBAX | RPBAX | CLBAX / RPBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.61 | 95% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.66 | 88% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 87 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 6.957 | 122% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 5.26B | 5,420% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.99 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 4.95 | 135% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 31.64 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 9.93 | 335% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 61.71 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement