Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs SBACX
CLBAX vs SBACX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs SBACX
CLBAX vs SBACX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. SBACX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and SBACX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. SBACX (997M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than SBACX: CLBAX (1.80) vs SBACX (0.53). CLBAX was incepted earlier than SBACX: CLBAX (25 years) vs SBACX (28 years). SBACX (1.76) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). SBACX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 88.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than SBACX: CLBAX (250) vs SBACX (2500). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. SBACX (3.13). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. SBACX (23.30).
| CLBAX | SBACX | CLBAX / SBACX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.76 | 33% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.76 | 33% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 4.702 | 180% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 997M | 28,586% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.53 | 342% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 3.13 | 213% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 33.65 | 123% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 23.30 | 143% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 69.36 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers