Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs STFBX
CLBAX vs STFBX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs STFBX
CLBAX vs STFBX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. STFBX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and STFBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. STFBX (2.78B). STFBX pays higher dividends than CLBAX: STFBX (2.00) vs CLBAX (1.80). CLBAX was incepted earlier than STFBX: CLBAX (25 years) vs STFBX (59 years). CLBAX (0.58) is less costly to investors than STFBX (0.17). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. STFBX (26.00). CLBAX (250) and STFBX (250) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. STFBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.60 vs. CLBAX (6.67). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. STFBX (24.09).
| CLBAX | STFBX | CLBAX / STFBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.14 | 414% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.17 | 341% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 59 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 10.221 | 83% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 250 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 2.78B | 10,263% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 2.00 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | 10.60 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | 29.91 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 24.09 | 138% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 100.75 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers