Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs TBLRX
CLBAX vs TBLRX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs TBLRX
CLBAX vs TBLRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. TBLRX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and TBLRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. TBLRX (72.3M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than TBLRX: CLBAX (1.78) vs TBLRX (1.24). CLBAX was incepted earlier than TBLRX: CLBAX (24 years) vs TBLRX (32 years). TBLRX (1.23) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). TBLRX (52.00) and CLBAX (50.00) have comparable annual turnover. TBLRX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBAX: TBLRX (0) vs CLBAX (250). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.74 vs. TBLRX (-9.09). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 37.18 vs. TBLRX (-13.91).
| CLBAX | TBLRX | CLBAX / TBLRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.10 | 53% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.23 | 47% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 32 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.696 | 5.631 | 172% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 72.3M | 385,892% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.24 | 143% |
| Returns for 1 year | 17.74 | -9.09 | -195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.52 | -0.28 | -16,097% |
| Returns for 5 years | 37.18 | -13.91 | -267% |
| Returns for 10 years | 97.87 | 17.28 | 566% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement