Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs TMAIX
CLBAX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs TMAIX
CLBAX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. TMAIX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. TMAIX (4.46B). CLBAX (1.80) and TMAIX (1.74) have matching dividends . CLBAX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: CLBAX (25 years) vs TMAIX (21 years). TMAIX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX (50.00) and TMAIX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: CLBAX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.64 vs. TMAIX (4.08). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 31.91 vs. TMAIX (15.84).
| CLBAX | TMAIX | CLBAX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.86 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.06 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.693 | 6.772 | 114% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 4.46B | 6,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.74 | 103% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.64 | 4.08 | 138% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.58 | 30.75 | 132% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.91 | 15.84 | 201% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.15 | 64.28 | 145% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement