Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs TMAIX
CLBAX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs TMAIX
CLBAX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. TMAIX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. TMAIX (4.48B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than TMAIX: CLBAX (1.78) vs TMAIX (1.67). CLBAX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: CLBAX (24 years) vs TMAIX (21 years). TMAIX (1.06) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX (50.00) and TMAIX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: CLBAX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.94 vs. TMAIX (11.45). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 38.41 vs. TMAIX (19.83).
| CLBAX | TMAIX | CLBAX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.86 | 67% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.06 | 55% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.834 | 5.957 | 148% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 4.48B | 6,424% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.67 | 107% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.94 | 11.45 | 139% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.20 | 30.31 | 139% |
| Returns for 5 years | 38.41 | 19.83 | 194% |
| Returns for 10 years | 98.45 | 68.14 | 144% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement