Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs WBCCX
CLBAX vs WBCCX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs WBCCX
CLBAX vs WBCCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. WBCCX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and WBCCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WBCCX (30.9M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than WBCCX: CLBAX (1.79) vs WBCCX (0.23). CLBAX was incepted earlier than WBCCX: CLBAX (24 years) vs WBCCX (25 years). WBCCX (2.18) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). WBCCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 77.00 vs. CLBAX (50.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WBCCX: CLBAX (250) vs WBCCX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.06 vs. WBCCX (-3.66). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 34.83 vs. WBCCX (-17.47).
| CLBAX | WBCCX | CLBAX / WBCCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.18 | 27% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 2.18 | 27% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.565 | 4.831 | 177% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 30.9M | 932,039% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 0.23 | 782% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.06 | -3.66 | -330% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.68 | 2.80 | 1,418% |
| Returns for 5 years | 34.83 | -17.47 | -199% |
| Returns for 10 years | 92.50 | -13.75 | -673% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement