Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs WFALX
CLBAX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs WFALX
CLBAX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. WFALX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and WFALX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. WFALX (1.21B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than WFALX: CLBAX (1.82) vs WFALX (0.49). CLBAX was incepted earlier than WFALX: CLBAX (25 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.82) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFALX (19.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: CLBAX (250) vs WFALX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. WFALX (-9.44). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.82 vs. WFALX (-28.03).
| CLBAX | WFALX | CLBAX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.81 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.82 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.098 | 6.764 | 149% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 1.21B | 23,447% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 0.49 | 367% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.63 | -9.44 | -134% |
| Returns for 3 years | 45.00 | -13.97 | -322% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.82 | -28.03 | -128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 94.05 | 8.55 | 1,100% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers