Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs WFALX
CLBAX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs WFALX
CLBAX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. WFALX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and WFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. WFALX (1.19B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than WFALX: CLBAX (1.80) vs WFALX (0.49). CLBAX was incepted earlier than WFALX: CLBAX (25 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.82) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFALX (19.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: CLBAX (250) vs WFALX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.67 vs. WFALX (-13.02). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. WFALX (-28.89).
| CLBAX | WFALX | CLBAX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.81 | 32% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.82 | 32% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.484 | 5.601 | 151% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.19B | 23,990% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 0.49 | 369% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.67 | -13.02 | -51% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.43 | -15.95 | -260% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | -28.89 | -115% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.16 | 9.18 | 1,037% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement