Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs WFATX
CLBAX vs WFATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs WFATX
CLBAX vs WFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. WFATX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and WFATX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. WFATX (1.21B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than WFATX: CLBAX (1.80) vs WFATX (1.17). CLBAX was incepted earlier than WFATX: CLBAX (25 years) vs WFATX (10 years). WFATX (0.76) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFATX (19.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFATX: CLBAX (250) vs WFATX (1000000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.40 vs. WFATX (0.76). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.28 vs. WFATX (-6.04).
| CLBAX | WFATX | CLBAX / WFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.75 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.76 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.775 | 7.315 | 134% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 1.21B | 23,408% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.80 | 1.17 | 153% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.40 | 0.76 | 1,362% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.96 | 10.16 | 423% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.28 | -6.04 | -551% |
| Returns for 10 years | 93.48 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement