Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs WFATX
CLBAX vs WFATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs WFATX
CLBAX vs WFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. WFATX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and WFATX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. WFATX (1.23B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than WFATX: CLBAX (1.82) vs WFATX (1.19). CLBAX was incepted earlier than WFATX: CLBAX (25 years) vs WFATX (10 years). WFATX (0.76) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFATX (19.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFATX: CLBAX (250) vs WFATX (1000000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.79 vs. WFATX (2.18). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.32 vs. WFATX (-3.68).
| CLBAX | WFATX | CLBAX / WFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.75 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.76 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.393 | 8.850 | 117% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 1.23B | 23,083% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.82 | 1.19 | 152% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.79 | 2.18 | 541% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.19 | 13.18 | 335% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.32 | -3.68 | -959% |
| Returns for 10 years | 95.11 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers