Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs WFATX
CLBAX vs WFATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs WFATX
CLBAX vs WFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. WFATX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Buy and WFATX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFATX (1.19B). CLBAX pays higher dividends than WFATX: CLBAX (1.79) vs WFATX (1.19). CLBAX was incepted earlier than WFATX: CLBAX (24 years) vs WFATX (10 years). WFATX (0.76) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFATX (19.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFATX: CLBAX (250) vs WFATX (1000000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.36 vs. WFATX (-0.05). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 33.49 vs. WFATX (-6.31).
| CLBAX | WFATX | CLBAX / WFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.75 | 77% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 0.76 | 76% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.785 | 4.987 | 156% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.19B | 24,161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.79 | 1.19 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.36 | -0.05 | -20,344% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.70 | 6.63 | 569% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.49 | -6.31 | -531% |
| Returns for 10 years | 91.19 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers