Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBAX vs WMBLX
CLBAX vs WMBLX Comparison
Open Charts CLBAX vs WMBLX
CLBAX vs WMBLX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBAX vs. WMBLX commentary
Jun 15, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBAX is a Hold and WMBLX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBAX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WMBLX (103M). CLBAX pays higher dividends than WMBLX: CLBAX (1.78) vs WMBLX (1.52). CLBAX was incepted earlier than WMBLX: CLBAX (24 years) vs WMBLX (28 years). WMBLX (1.29) is less costly to investors than CLBAX (0.58). CLBAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WMBLX (22.00). CLBAX has a lower initial minimum investment than WMBLX: CLBAX (250) vs WMBLX (1000). CLBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.90 vs. WMBLX (12.46). CLBAX return over 5 years is better than : 35.04 vs. WMBLX (7.15).
| CLBAX | WMBLX | CLBAX / WMBLX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.29 | 45% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.58 | 1.29 | 45% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.651 | 8.756 | 99% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 103M | 279,612% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.52 | 117% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.90 | 12.46 | 120% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.62 | 17.72 | 240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 35.04 | 7.15 | 490% |
| Returns for 10 years | 96.94 | 43.34 | 224% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement