Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FASMX
CLBCX vs FASMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FASMX
CLBCX vs FASMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FASMX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FASMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FASMX (10.9B). FASMX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FASMX (2.14) vs CLBCX (1.07). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FASMX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FASMX (38 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.56). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FASMX (25.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FASMX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FASMX (11.38) and CLBCX (11.19) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.80 vs. FASMX (18.76).
| CLBCX | FASMX | CLBCX / FASMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.53 | 255% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.56 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.102 | 8.868 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 10.9B | 2,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 2.14 | 50% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.19 | 11.38 | 98% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.50 | 32.44 | 113% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.80 | 18.76 | 159% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.55 | 66.04 | 119% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement