Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FASMX
CLBCX vs FASMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FASMX
CLBCX vs FASMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FASMX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FASMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FASMX (10.9B). FASMX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FASMX (2.07) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FASMX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FASMX (38 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.56). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FASMX (25.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FASMX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FASMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.33 vs. CLBCX (5.85). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.28 vs. FASMX (16.67).
| CLBCX | FASMX | CLBCX / FASMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.53 | 255% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.56 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.915 | 8.545 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 10.9B | 2,615% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 2.07 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | 6.33 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.25 | 34.52 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.28 | 16.67 | 170% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.07 | 65.15 | 124% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers