Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FASMX
CLBCX vs FASMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FASMX
CLBCX vs FASMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FASMX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FASMX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FASMX (10.8B). FASMX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FASMX (2.10) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FASMX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FASMX (38 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FASMX (0.56). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FASMX (25.00). FASMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FASMX (0) vs CLBCX (250). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.76 vs. FASMX (10.12). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.74 vs. FASMX (18.98).
| CLBCX | FASMX | CLBCX / FASMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.53 | 255% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.56 | 241% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 38 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.546 | 9.423 | 101% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 10.8B | 2,620% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 2.10 | 52% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 10.12 | 116% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.73 | 37.29 | 112% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 18.98 | 162% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.93 | 63.84 | 125% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers