Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FCISX
CLBCX vs FCISX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FCISX
CLBCX vs FCISX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FCISX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FCISX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FCISX (80.4B). FCISX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FCISX (4.59) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FCISX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FCISX (31 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FCISX (1.11). FCISX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBCX (50.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FCISX: CLBCX (250) vs FCISX (1000). FCISX (9.83) and CLBCX (9.55) have marching annual gain over last year. FCISX (29.29) and CLBCX (28.34) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBCX | FCISX | CLBCX / FCISX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.11 | 122% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.11 | 122% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 31 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.198 | 6.832 | 135% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 80.4B | 352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 4.59 | 23% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.55 | 9.83 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.74 | 33.02 | 120% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.34 | 29.29 | 97% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.50 | 74.82 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers