Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FFCMX
CLBCX vs FFCMX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FFCMX
CLBCX vs FFCMX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FFCMX commentary
Jul 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FFCMX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FFCMX (10.9B). FFCMX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FFCMX (1.22) vs CLBCX (1.07). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FFCMX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FFCMX (20 years). FFCMX (1.60) is less costly to investors than CLBCX (1.35). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FFCMX (25.00). FFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FFCMX (0) vs CLBCX (250). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.33 vs. FFCMX (9.59). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.82 vs. FFCMX (12.03).
| CLBCX | FFCMX | CLBCX / FFCMX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.57 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.60 | 84% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 20 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.851 | 7.872 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 10.9B | 2,642% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.22 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.33 | 9.59 | 129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | 29.19 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.82 | 12.03 | 256% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.27 | 51.85 | 159% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers