Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FISRX
CLBCX vs FISRX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FISRX
CLBCX vs FISRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FISRX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FISRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FISRX (80.5B). FISRX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FISRX (5.03) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FISRX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FISRX (25 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FISRX (0.96). FISRX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBCX (50.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FISRX: CLBCX (250) vs FISRX (1000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.76 vs. FISRX (10.55). FISRX (31.17) and CLBCX (30.74) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBCX | FISRX | CLBCX / FISRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.96 | 141% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.96 | 141% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.546 | 6.882 | 139% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 80.5B | 352% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 5.03 | 22% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 10.55 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.73 | 35.00 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 31.17 | 99% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.93 | 77.29 | 103% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers