Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FKINX
CLBCX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FKINX
CLBCX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FKINX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FKINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FKINX (79.4B). FKINX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FKINX (5.19) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FKINX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FKINX (78 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FKINX (0.61). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBCX (50.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: CLBCX (250) vs FKINX (1000). FKINX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.87 vs. CLBCX (5.12). FKINX return over 5 years is better than : 32.71 vs. CLBCX (27.94).
| CLBCX | FKINX | CLBCX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.61 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.61 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.339 | 6.143 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 79.4B | 359% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 5.19 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.12 | 8.87 | 58% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.06 | 34.30 | 111% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.94 | 32.71 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.54 | 83.48 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement