Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FKINX
CLBCX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FKINX
CLBCX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FKINX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FKINX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FKINX (79.5B). FKINX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FKINX (5.18) vs CLBCX (1.10). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FKINX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FKINX (78 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FKINX (0.61). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBCX (50.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: CLBCX (250) vs FKINX (1000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 16.84 vs. FKINX (14.43). CLBCX (32.06) and FKINX (31.36) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBCX | FKINX | CLBCX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.61 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.61 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.330 | 5.157 | 181% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 79.5B | 351% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 5.18 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.84 | 14.43 | 117% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.21 | 33.74 | 125% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.06 | 31.36 | 102% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.43 | 88.35 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement