Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FKINX
CLBCX vs FKINX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FKINX
CLBCX vs FKINX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FKINX commentary
Aug 11, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FKINX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FKINX (80.2B). FKINX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FKINX (5.22) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FKINX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FKINX (78 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FKINX (0.61). FKINX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 62.14 vs. CLBCX (50.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FKINX: CLBCX (250) vs FKINX (1000). FKINX (12.00) and CLBCX (11.89) have marching annual gain over last year. FKINX (32.06) and CLBCX (30.52) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBCX | FKINX | CLBCX / FKINX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.61 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.61 | 221% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 78 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.733 | 6.507 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | 250 | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 80.2B | 359% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 5.22 | 21% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.89 | 12.00 | 99% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.83 | 33.61 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.52 | 32.06 | 95% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.52 | 82.96 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement