Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FOBAX
CLBCX vs FOBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FOBAX
CLBCX vs FOBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FOBAX commentary
Aug 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FOBAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FOBAX (82.4M). FOBAX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FOBAX (1.18) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FOBAX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FOBAX (30 years). CLBCX (1.35) and FOBAX (1.32) have similar cost to investors . CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FOBAX (21.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBAX: CLBCX (250) vs FOBAX (1000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.14 vs. FOBAX (1.77). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.52 vs. FOBAX (5.11).
| CLBCX | FOBAX | CLBCX / FOBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.32 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.733 | 6.488 | 150% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 82.4M | 343,447% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.18 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.14 | 1.77 | 631% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.59 | 20.58 | 202% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.52 | 5.11 | 598% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.46 | 35.36 | 230% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers