Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FOBAX
CLBCX vs FOBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FOBAX
CLBCX vs FOBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FOBAX commentary
Jul 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FOBAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FOBAX (81.3M). FOBAX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FOBAX (1.20) vs CLBCX (1.07). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FOBAX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FOBAX (30 years). CLBCX (1.35) and FOBAX (1.32) have similar cost to investors . CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FOBAX (21.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than FOBAX: CLBCX (250) vs FOBAX (1000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.40 vs. FOBAX (0.27). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.57 vs. FOBAX (3.31).
| CLBCX | FOBAX | CLBCX / FOBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.91 | 148% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.32 | 102% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.407 | 3.927 | 189% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 81.3M | 354,244% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.20 | 89% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.40 | 0.27 | 3,502% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.58 | 14.67 | 236% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.57 | 3.31 | 864% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.33 | 31.95 | 242% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers