Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FPKFX
CLBCX vs FPKFX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FPKFX
CLBCX vs FPKFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FPKFX commentary
Aug 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FPKFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FPKFX (2.29B). FPKFX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FPKFX (1.70) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FPKFX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FPKFX (7 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FPKFX (0.33). FPKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. CLBCX (50.00). FPKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FPKFX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FPKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.26 vs. CLBCX (10.97). FPKFX return over 5 years is better than : 41.13 vs. CLBCX (30.13).
| CLBCX | FPKFX | CLBCX / FPKFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.33 | 409% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.33 | 409% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.733 | 10.031 | 97% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 2.29B | 12,374% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.70 | 64% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.97 | 12.26 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.83 | 50.14 | 79% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.13 | 41.13 | 73% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.52 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers