Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FPKFX
CLBCX vs FPKFX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FPKFX
CLBCX vs FPKFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FPKFX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FPKFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FPKFX (2.35B). FPKFX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FPKFX (1.63) vs CLBCX (1.10). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FPKFX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FPKFX (7 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FPKFX (0.33). FPKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. CLBCX (50.00). FPKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FPKFX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FPKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 19.75 vs. CLBCX (16.84). FPKFX return over 5 years is better than : 45.98 vs. CLBCX (32.06).
| CLBCX | FPKFX | CLBCX / FPKFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.33 | 409% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.33 | 409% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.330 | 9.696 | 96% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 2.35B | 11,857% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.63 | 67% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.84 | 19.75 | 85% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.21 | 52.89 | 80% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.06 | 45.98 | 70% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.43 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement