Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FPKFX
CLBCX vs FPKFX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FPKFX
CLBCX vs FPKFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FPKFX commentary
Sep 10, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FPKFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FPKFX (2.3B). FPKFX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FPKFX (1.67) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FPKFX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FPKFX (7 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FPKFX (0.33). FPKFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. CLBCX (50.00). FPKFX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FPKFX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FPKFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.64 vs. CLBCX (8.33). FPKFX return over 5 years is better than : 40.90 vs. CLBCX (29.13).
| CLBCX | FPKFX | CLBCX / FPKFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.33 | 409% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.33 | 409% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 7 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.985 | 10.382 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 2.3B | 12,391% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.67 | 65% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.33 | 11.64 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.70 | 48.71 | 81% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.13 | 40.90 | 71% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement