Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FPUKX
CLBCX vs FPUKX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FPUKX
CLBCX vs FPUKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FPUKX commentary
Jun 20, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FPUKX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FPUKX (33.8B). FPUKX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FPUKX (1.56) vs CLBCX (1.10). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FPUKX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FPUKX (18 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FPUKX (0.40). FPUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. CLBCX (50.00). FPUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FPUKX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FPUKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.23 vs. CLBCX (15.02). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. FPUKX (9.69).
| CLBCX | FPUKX | CLBCX / FPUKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.40 | 338% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.40 | 338% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.423 | 10.443 | 81% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 33.8B | 852% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.56 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.02 | 17.23 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | 32.68 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 9.69 | 343% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.01 | 59.88 | 140% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers