Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FPUKX
CLBCX vs FPUKX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FPUKX
CLBCX vs FPUKX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FPUKX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FPUKX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FPUKX (33.4B). FPUKX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FPUKX (1.59) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FPUKX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FPUKX (18 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FPUKX (0.40). FPUKX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 58.00 vs. CLBCX (50.00). FPUKX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FPUKX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FPUKX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.83 vs. CLBCX (5.85). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.28 vs. FPUKX (4.29).
| CLBCX | FPUKX | CLBCX / FPUKX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.40 | 338% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.40 | 338% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 18 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.915 | 9.000 | 88% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 33.4B | 853% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.59 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | 6.83 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.25 | 29.23 | 131% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.28 | 4.29 | 660% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.07 | 53.89 | 150% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement