Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSAAX
CLBCX vs FSAAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSAAX
CLBCX vs FSAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSAAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FSAAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSAAX (5.6B). FSAAX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FSAAX (1.60) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSAAX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FSAAX (19 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSAAX (0.95). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSAAX (29.00). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSAAX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.78 vs. CLBCX (10.49). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.10 vs. FSAAX (24.75).
| CLBCX | FSAAX | CLBCX / FSAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.92 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.95 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.915 | 8.898 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.6B | 5,141% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.60 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.49 | 12.78 | 82% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.52 | 36.49 | 97% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.10 | 24.75 | 118% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.39 | 84.43 | 94% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers