Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSAAX
CLBCX vs FSAAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSAAX
CLBCX vs FSAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSAAX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FSAAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FSAAX (5.7B). FSAAX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FSAAX (1.57) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSAAX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FSAAX (19 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSAAX (0.95). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSAAX (29.00). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSAAX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.06 vs. CLBCX (5.85). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.28 vs. FSAAX (24.16).
| CLBCX | FSAAX | CLBCX / FSAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.92 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.95 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.915 | 9.664 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 5.7B | 5,004% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.57 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | 9.06 | 65% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.25 | 40.81 | 94% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.28 | 24.16 | 117% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.07 | 85.56 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement