Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSAAX
CLBCX vs FSAAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSAAX
CLBCX vs FSAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSAAX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FSAAX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FSAAX (5.6B). FSAAX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FSAAX (1.60) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSAAX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FSAAX (19 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSAAX (0.95). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSAAX (29.00). FSAAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSAAX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSAAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.25 vs. CLBCX (11.76). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.74 vs. FSAAX (26.87).
| CLBCX | FSAAX | CLBCX / FSAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.92 | 147% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.95 | 142% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.546 | 10.607 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 5.6B | 5,052% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.60 | 68% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 13.25 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.73 | 43.88 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 26.87 | 114% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.93 | 83.99 | 95% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers