Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSANX
CLBCX vs FSANX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSANX
CLBCX vs FSANX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSANX commentary
Sep 05, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FSANX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FSANX (5.7B). FSANX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FSANX (1.82) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSANX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FSANX (19 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSANX (0.65). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSANX (29.00). FSANX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSANX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.63 vs. CLBCX (9.55). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.34 vs. FSANX (25.73).
| CLBCX | FSANX | CLBCX / FSANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.63 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.198 | 10.603 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 5.7B | 4,968% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.82 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.55 | 12.63 | 76% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.74 | 41.91 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.34 | 25.73 | 110% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.50 | 89.69 | 89% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers