Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSANX
CLBCX vs FSANX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSANX
CLBCX vs FSANX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSANX commentary
Aug 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FSANX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FSANX (5.6B). FSANX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FSANX (1.85) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSANX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FSANX (19 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSANX (0.65). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSANX (29.00). FSANX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSANX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSANX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.87 vs. CLBCX (10.93). CLBCX (30.26) and FSANX (28.90) have equivalent 5 years return.
| CLBCX | FSANX | CLBCX / FSANX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.63 | 214% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.65 | 208% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.840 | 11.951 | 82% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 5.6B | 5,052% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.85 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.93 | 13.87 | 79% |
| Returns for 3 years | 40.94 | 45.39 | 90% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.26 | 28.90 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.98 | 92.69 | 87% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement