Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSATX
CLBCX vs FSATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSATX
CLBCX vs FSATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSATX commentary
Sep 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FSATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FSATX (5.7B). FSATX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FSATX (1.36) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSATX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FSATX (19 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.20). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSATX (29.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSATX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.70 vs. CLBCX (5.12). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.94 vs. FSATX (23.35).
| CLBCX | FSATX | CLBCX / FSATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.17 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.20 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.339 | 9.834 | 75% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 5.7B | 5,004% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.36 | 79% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.12 | 8.70 | 59% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.06 | 40.82 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.94 | 23.35 | 120% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.54 | 80.70 | 99% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement