Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSATX
CLBCX vs FSATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSATX
CLBCX vs FSATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSATX commentary
Jun 28, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FSATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSATX (5.61B). FSATX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FSATX (1.37) vs CLBCX (1.10). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSATX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FSATX (19 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSATX (1.20). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSATX (29.00). FSATX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSATX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSATX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.14 vs. CLBCX (12.77). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 31.33 vs. FSATX (24.49).
| CLBCX | FSATX | CLBCX / FSATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.17 | 115% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.20 | 113% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.450 | 9.064 | 93% |
| Front Load | N/A | 4% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.61B | 5,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.37 | 80% |
| Returns for 1 year | 12.77 | 14.14 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.52 | 39.02 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | 31.33 | 24.49 | 128% |
| Returns for 10 years | 85.28 | 87.75 | 97% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement