Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSCNX
CLBCX vs FSCNX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSCNX
CLBCX vs FSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSCNX commentary
Jun 04, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FSCNX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 279B vs. FSCNX (5.61B). CLBCX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: CLBCX (1.10) vs FSCNX (0.89). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSCNX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FSCNX (19 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CLBCX (1.35). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSCNX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSCNX (17.37) and CLBCX (16.84) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.06 vs. FSCNX (23.78).
| CLBCX | FSCNX | CLBCX / FSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.70 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.330 | 9.438 | 99% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 279B | 5.61B | 4,975% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.89 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 16.84 | 17.37 | 97% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.21 | 38.59 | 109% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.06 | 23.78 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 83.43 | 78.53 | 106% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement