Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSCNX
CLBCX vs FSCNX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSCNX
CLBCX vs FSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSCNX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FSCNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. FSCNX (5.7B). CLBCX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: CLBCX (1.08) vs FSCNX (0.89). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSCNX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FSCNX (19 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CLBCX (1.35). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSCNX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.20 vs. CLBCX (5.85). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.28 vs. FSCNX (19.34).
| CLBCX | FSCNX | CLBCX / FSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.70 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.915 | 9.080 | 87% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 5.7B | 5,004% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.89 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | 8.20 | 71% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.25 | 37.53 | 102% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.28 | 19.34 | 146% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.07 | 75.00 | 108% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement