Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSCNX
CLBCX vs FSCNX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSCNX
CLBCX vs FSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSCNX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FSCNX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSCNX (5.61B). CLBCX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: CLBCX (1.10) vs FSCNX (0.89). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSCNX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FSCNX (19 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CLBCX (1.35). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSCNX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSCNX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 17.21 vs. CLBCX (15.81). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. FSCNX (23.36).
| CLBCX | FSCNX | CLBCX / FSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.70 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.958 | 9.916 | 90% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.61B | 5,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.89 | 123% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.81 | 17.21 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.06 | 38.89 | 106% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | 23.36 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.46 | 83.43 | 104% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement