Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSCNX
CLBCX vs FSCNX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSCNX
CLBCX vs FSCNX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSCNX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FSCNX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FSCNX (5.6B). CLBCX pays higher dividends than FSCNX: CLBCX (1.09) vs FSCNX (0.90). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSCNX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FSCNX (19 years). FSCNX (1.70) is less costly to investors than CLBCX (1.35). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSCNX (29.00). FSCNX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSCNX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSCNX (12.31) and CLBCX (11.76) have marching annual gain over last year. CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.74 vs. FSCNX (22.00).
| CLBCX | FSCNX | CLBCX / FSCNX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.67 | 81% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.70 | 79% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.546 | 10.036 | 95% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 5.6B | 5,052% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 0.90 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 12.31 | 96% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.73 | 40.59 | 103% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 22.00 | 140% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.93 | 73.34 | 109% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers