Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSNIX
CLBCX vs FSNIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSNIX
CLBCX vs FSNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSNIX commentary
Aug 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and FSNIX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 283B vs. FSNIX (5.6B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FSNIX (1.79) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSNIX: CLBCX (25 years) vs FSNIX (19 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.70). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSNIX (29.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSNIX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 13.53 vs. CLBCX (11.76). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.74 vs. FSNIX (28.51).
| CLBCX | FSNIX | CLBCX / FSNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.67 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.70 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.546 | 10.721 | 89% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 283B | 5.6B | 5,052% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 1.79 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.76 | 13.53 | 87% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.73 | 44.99 | 93% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.74 | 28.51 | 108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.93 | 88.98 | 90% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers