Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs FSNIX
CLBCX vs FSNIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs FSNIX
CLBCX vs FSNIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. FSNIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and FSNIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. FSNIX (5.61B). FSNIX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: FSNIX (1.78) vs CLBCX (1.10). CLBCX was incepted earlier than FSNIX: CLBCX (24 years) vs FSNIX (19 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than FSNIX (0.70). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. FSNIX (29.00). FSNIX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: FSNIX (0) vs CLBCX (250). FSNIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 18.46 vs. CLBCX (15.81). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. FSNIX (29.94).
| CLBCX | FSNIX | CLBCX / FSNIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.67 | 201% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.70 | 193% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 19 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.958 | 10.428 | 86% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.61B | 5,136% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.78 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.81 | 18.46 | 86% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.06 | 43.26 | 95% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | 29.94 | 109% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.46 | 99.97 | 86% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement