Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs MSFHX
CLBCX vs MSFHX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs MSFHX
CLBCX vs MSFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. MSFHX commentary
Aug 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and MSFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MSFHX (7.56B). MSFHX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: MSFHX (2.36) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than MSFHX: CLBCX (24 years) vs MSFHX (21 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MSFHX (0.72). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFHX (41.00). MSFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: MSFHX (0) vs CLBCX (250). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.84 vs. MSFHX (6.67). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.36 vs. MSFHX (1.10).
| CLBCX | MSFHX | CLBCX / MSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.72 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.72 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.626 | 8.058 | 119% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 7.56B | 3,812% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 2.36 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.84 | 6.67 | 178% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.70 | 15.59 | 255% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.36 | 1.10 | 2,752% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.34 | 37.77 | 213% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers