Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs MSFHX
CLBCX vs MSFHX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs MSFHX
CLBCX vs MSFHX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. MSFHX commentary
Sep 12, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and MSFHX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. MSFHX (7.36B). MSFHX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: MSFHX (2.32) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than MSFHX: CLBCX (25 years) vs MSFHX (21 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MSFHX (0.72). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFHX (41.00). MSFHX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: MSFHX (0) vs CLBCX (250). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 6.90 vs. MSFHX (2.86). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.92 vs. MSFHX (0.02).
| CLBCX | MSFHX | CLBCX / MSFHX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.72 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.72 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.450 | 6.210 | 136% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 7.36B | 3,873% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 2.32 | 46% |
| Returns for 1 year | 6.90 | 2.86 | 241% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.71 | 14.62 | 265% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.92 | 0.02 | 148,861% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.06 | 36.23 | 221% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement