Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs MSFRX
CLBCX vs MSFRX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs MSFRX
CLBCX vs MSFRX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. MSFRX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and MSFRX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. MSFRX (7.36B). MSFRX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: MSFRX (2.43) vs CLBCX (1.10). CLBCX was incepted earlier than MSFRX: CLBCX (24 years) vs MSFRX (56 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than MSFRX (0.72). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. MSFRX (41.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than MSFRX: CLBCX (250) vs MSFRX (1000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.81 vs. MSFRX (3.98). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. MSFRX (-0.97).
| CLBCX | MSFRX | CLBCX / MSFRX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.72 | 188% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.72 | 188% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 56 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.958 | 2.505 | 358% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 7.36B | 3,911% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 2.43 | 45% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.81 | 3.98 | 398% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.06 | 12.18 | 337% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | -0.97 | -3,360% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.46 | 36.74 | 235% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement