Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs PABAX
CLBCX vs PABAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs PABAX
CLBCX vs PABAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. PABAX commentary
Aug 03, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and PABAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. PABAX (3.13B). PABAX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: PABAX (2.14) vs CLBCX (1.09). CLBCX was incepted earlier than PABAX: CLBCX (24 years) vs PABAX (33 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than PABAX (0.90). PABAX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 158.00 vs. CLBCX (50.00). PABAX has a lower initial minimum investment than CLBCX: PABAX (0) vs CLBCX (250). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.49 vs. PABAX (9.39). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.10 vs. PABAX (8.02).
| CLBCX | PABAX | CLBCX / PABAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 33 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.915 | 6.305 | 126% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 3.13B | 9,213% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.09 | 2.14 | 51% |
| Returns for 1 year | 10.49 | 9.39 | 112% |
| Returns for 3 years | 35.52 | 30.07 | 118% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.10 | 8.02 | 363% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.39 | 51.43 | 154% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement