Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs RPBAX
CLBCX vs RPBAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs RPBAX
CLBCX vs RPBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. RPBAX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and RPBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. RPBAX (5.29B). RPBAX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: RPBAX (2.05) vs CLBCX (1.10). CLBCX was incepted earlier than RPBAX: CLBCX (24 years) vs RPBAX (87 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than RPBAX (0.66). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. RPBAX (43.70). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than RPBAX: CLBCX (250) vs RPBAX (2500). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.81 vs. RPBAX (11.97). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. RPBAX (12.99).
| CLBCX | RPBAX | CLBCX / RPBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.61 | 221% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.66 | 205% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 87 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.958 | 6.485 | 138% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 5.29B | 5,445% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 2.05 | 54% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.81 | 11.97 | 132% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.06 | 32.66 | 126% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | 12.99 | 252% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.46 | 68.25 | 127% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement