Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs SFAAX
CLBCX vs SFAAX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs SFAAX
CLBCX vs SFAAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. SFAAX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and SFAAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. SFAAX (1.18B). CLBCX pays higher dividends than SFAAX: CLBCX (1.08) vs SFAAX (0.90). CLBCX was incepted earlier than SFAAX: CLBCX (25 years) vs SFAAX (40 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than SFAAX (1.07). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. SFAAX (19.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than SFAAX: CLBCX (250) vs SFAAX (1000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.44 vs. SFAAX (-2.67). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.11 vs. SFAAX (-6.62).
| CLBCX | SFAAX | CLBCX / SFAAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.06 | 127% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.07 | 126% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 40 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.644 | 6.034 | 110% |
| Front Load | N/A | 6% | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.18B | 24,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.90 | 120% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.44 | -2.67 | -166% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.85 | 9.33 | 395% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.11 | -6.62 | -409% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.37 | 45.46 | 172% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers