Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs TMAIX
CLBCX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs TMAIX
CLBCX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. TMAIX commentary
Sep 16, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. TMAIX (4.46B). TMAIX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: TMAIX (1.74) vs CLBCX (1.08). CLBCX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: CLBCX (25 years) vs TMAIX (21 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than TMAIX (1.06). CLBCX (50.00) and TMAIX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: CLBCX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.86 vs. TMAIX (4.08). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.00 vs. TMAIX (15.84).
| CLBCX | TMAIX | CLBCX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.86 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.06 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.099 | 6.772 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 4.46B | 6,386% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 1.74 | 62% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.86 | 4.08 | 119% |
| Returns for 3 years | 37.44 | 30.75 | 122% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.00 | 15.84 | 171% |
| Returns for 10 years | 79.14 | 64.28 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement