Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs TMAIX
CLBCX vs TMAIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs TMAIX
CLBCX vs TMAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. TMAIX commentary
Jun 18, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and TMAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. TMAIX (4.48B). TMAIX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: TMAIX (1.67) vs CLBCX (1.10). CLBCX was incepted earlier than TMAIX: CLBCX (24 years) vs TMAIX (21 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than TMAIX (1.06). CLBCX (50.00) and TMAIX (49.00) have comparable annual turnover. CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than TMAIX: CLBCX (250) vs TMAIX (2000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.02 vs. TMAIX (11.45). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 33.22 vs. TMAIX (19.83).
| CLBCX | TMAIX | CLBCX / TMAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.86 | 157% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.06 | 127% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.423 | 5.957 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 4.48B | 6,424% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.67 | 66% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.02 | 11.45 | 131% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.98 | 30.31 | 129% |
| Returns for 5 years | 33.22 | 19.83 | 168% |
| Returns for 10 years | 84.01 | 68.14 | 123% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement