Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs WFAIX
CLBCX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs WFAIX
CLBCX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. WFAIX commentary
Sep 17, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and WFAIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. WFAIX (1.18B). CLBCX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: CLBCX (1.08) vs WFAIX (0.96). CLBCX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: CLBCX (25 years) vs WFAIX (27 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than WFAIX (1.01). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFAIX (19.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: CLBCX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.44 vs. WFAIX (-2.47). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 27.11 vs. WFAIX (-5.97).
| CLBCX | WFAIX | CLBCX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.01 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.644 | 6.163 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.18B | 24,071% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.96 | 113% |
| Returns for 1 year | 4.44 | -2.47 | -179% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.85 | 9.92 | 371% |
| Returns for 5 years | 27.11 | -5.97 | -454% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.37 | 47.19 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement