Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs WFAIX
CLBCX vs WFAIX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs WFAIX
CLBCX vs WFAIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. WFAIX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and WFAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFAIX (1.22B). CLBCX pays higher dividends than WFAIX: CLBCX (1.10) vs WFAIX (0.96). CLBCX was incepted earlier than WFAIX: CLBCX (24 years) vs WFAIX (27 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than WFAIX (1.01). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFAIX (19.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFAIX: CLBCX (250) vs WFAIX (1000000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.81 vs. WFAIX (5.26). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. WFAIX (-2.77).
| CLBCX | WFAIX | CLBCX / WFAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.90 | 150% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.01 | 134% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 27 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.958 | 6.185 | 145% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.96 | 114% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.81 | 5.26 | 301% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.06 | 10.51 | 391% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | -2.77 | -1,183% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.46 | 52.04 | 166% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement