Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs WFALX
CLBCX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs WFALX
CLBCX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. WFALX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and WFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 285B vs. WFALX (1.19B). CLBCX pays higher dividends than WFALX: CLBCX (1.08) vs WFALX (0.49). CLBCX was incepted earlier than WFALX: CLBCX (25 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.82) is less costly to investors than CLBCX (1.35). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFALX (19.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: CLBCX (250) vs WFALX (1000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.85 vs. WFALX (-13.02). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.28 vs. WFALX (-28.89).
| CLBCX | WFALX | CLBCX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.81 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.82 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 25 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.915 | 5.601 | 141% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 285B | 1.19B | 23,990% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.08 | 0.49 | 221% |
| Returns for 1 year | 5.85 | -13.02 | -45% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.25 | -15.95 | -240% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.28 | -28.89 | -98% |
| Returns for 10 years | 81.07 | 9.18 | 883% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement