Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs WFALX
CLBCX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs WFALX
CLBCX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. WFALX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and WFALX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFALX (1.22B). CLBCX pays higher dividends than WFALX: CLBCX (1.10) vs WFALX (0.52). CLBCX was incepted earlier than WFALX: CLBCX (24 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.83) is less costly to investors than CLBCX (1.35). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFALX (19.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: CLBCX (250) vs WFALX (1000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 15.81 vs. WFALX (-6.46). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 32.72 vs. WFALX (-26.25).
| CLBCX | WFALX | CLBCX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.82 | 74% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.83 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.958 | 5.699 | 157% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,645% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 0.52 | 212% |
| Returns for 1 year | 15.81 | -6.46 | -245% |
| Returns for 3 years | 41.06 | -15.35 | -267% |
| Returns for 5 years | 32.72 | -26.25 | -125% |
| Returns for 10 years | 86.46 | 12.25 | 706% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement