Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs WFALX
CLBCX vs WFALX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs WFALX
CLBCX vs WFALX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. WFALX commentary
Jul 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and WFALX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFALX (1.22B). CLBCX pays higher dividends than WFALX: CLBCX (1.07) vs WFALX (0.49). CLBCX was incepted earlier than WFALX: CLBCX (24 years) vs WFALX (28 years). WFALX (1.82) is less costly to investors than CLBCX (1.35). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFALX (19.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFALX: CLBCX (250) vs WFALX (1000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 11.19 vs. WFALX (-8.67). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 29.80 vs. WFALX (-27.61).
| CLBCX | WFALX | CLBCX / WFALX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.81 | 75% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 1.82 | 74% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 28 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.102 | 6.210 | 130% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 0.49 | 218% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.19 | -8.67 | -129% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.50 | -16.69 | -219% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.80 | -27.61 | -108% |
| Returns for 10 years | 78.55 | 8.71 | 902% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers