Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs WFATX
CLBCX vs WFATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs WFATX
CLBCX vs WFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. WFATX commentary
Jun 14, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Hold and WFATX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFATX (1.22B). WFATX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: WFATX (1.18) vs CLBCX (1.10). CLBCX was incepted earlier than WFATX: CLBCX (24 years) vs WFATX (10 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than WFATX (0.76). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFATX (19.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFATX: CLBCX (250) vs WFATX (1000000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.05 vs. WFATX (3.91). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 30.04 vs. WFATX (-3.03).
| CLBCX | WFATX | CLBCX / WFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.75 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.76 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 8.288 | 5.555 | 149% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.22B | 23,626% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.10 | 1.18 | 93% |
| Returns for 1 year | 14.05 | 3.91 | 359% |
| Returns for 3 years | 39.45 | 10.16 | 388% |
| Returns for 5 years | 30.04 | -3.03 | -993% |
| Returns for 10 years | 82.72 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers