Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
CLBCX vs WFATX
CLBCX vs WFATX Comparison
Open Charts CLBCX vs WFATX
CLBCX vs WFATX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
CLBCX vs. WFATX commentary
Jul 27, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is CLBCX is a Buy and WFATX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLBCX has more cash in the bank: 288B vs. WFATX (1.19B). WFATX pays higher dividends than CLBCX: WFATX (1.19) vs CLBCX (1.07). CLBCX was incepted earlier than WFATX: CLBCX (24 years) vs WFATX (10 years). CLBCX (1.35) is less costly to investors than WFATX (0.76). CLBCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 50.00 vs. WFATX (19.00). CLBCX has a lower initial minimum investment than WFATX: CLBCX (250) vs WFATX (1000000). CLBCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.53 vs. WFATX (-0.05). CLBCX return over 5 years is better than : 28.52 vs. WFATX (-6.31).
| CLBCX | WFATX | CLBCX / WFATX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.75 | 180% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.35 | 0.76 | 178% |
| Fund Existence | 24 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 7.327 | 4.987 | 147% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000000 | 0% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 288B | 1.19B | 24,161% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.07 | 1.19 | 90% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.53 | -0.05 | -18,718% |
| Returns for 3 years | 34.65 | 6.63 | 523% |
| Returns for 5 years | 28.52 | -6.31 | -452% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.34 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers